Neogene: Braarudosphaeraceae
Paleogene: Braarudosphaeraceae
Family BRAARUDOSPHAERACEAE Deflandre 1947
Basic morphology: Cell is typically non-motile and entirely enclosed in an exotheca of twelve plates each with five-fold symmetry (pentaliths). Cells have frequently been isolated but have never grown in culture, they contain visible chloroplasts, so are not cysts or protozoa (Lefort 1972, pers. comms. Green, Probert, Hagino). Lefort (1972) observed, and illustrated, rare specimens of B. magnei with two apically placed, sub-equal flagella.
Affinities: Braarudosphaera was long considered a group of highly uncertain affinities and possibly dinoflagellates, but recent molecular genetic data (Takano et al. 2006) has shown that they occupy a basal position within the coccolithophore clade, and so are definitely haptophytes and probably derived in some way from coccolithophores.
Pentalith morphology: Pentaliths consist of five segments, each of which behaves as a discrete crystal-unit with c-axis parallel to edge of the pentalith. A lamellar substructure to the segments is consistently present.
Diversity: Only two extant species have been described and only one of these, B. bigelowii, is well-established, but the family has a geological record back to the Early Cretaceous including several genera and many species (e.g. Perch-Nielsen 1985a,b, Aubry 1989, Bown 2005). These include forms with heavily ornamented pentaliths and pentaliths with concave sides. They sometimes occur in enormous abundance in sediments suggesting that Braarudosphaera can form massive blooms (see Peleo-Alampay et al. 1999). At present day, Braarudosphaera occurs sporadically in shelf environments, usually under conditions of lowered salinity.
Original description:
Neogene: Braarudosphaera; Braarudosphaeraceae
Nannoliths - informal grouping. Used here in the sense of Young & Bown (1987)
Description - the following groups of Neogene nannofossils are thought to be related to coccolithophores, but produce structures which are neither heterococcoliths nor holococcoliths.
| |
|
|
||
| Braarudosphaeraceae | Ceratolithaceae | Discoasteraceae | Sphenolithaceae | Triquetrorhabdulaceae |
The term nannolith has been used, especially by palaeontologists, as a convenient term for structures about the same size as coccoliths and occurring with coccoliths, but lacking definite coccolith affinities. In the modern nannoflora, there are fewer groups of cryptic origins, and the term has been less widely used. However, it is useful for calcareous structures that are thought to be formed by haptophytes, but probably by a different biomineralisation process to either heterococcoliths or holococcoliths (Young et al. 1999).
NB The first use of the term in this sense appears to have been by Haq (1978, in Introduction to Marine Micropaleontology), and this was followed by Perch-Nielsen (1985, in Plankton Stratigraphy). By contrast, Aubry (1988 et seq., Handbook of Calcareous Nannofossils) places most of these groups in the Ortholithae.