Order ZYGODISCALES Young & Bown 1997
Taxa included: The extant families Helicosphaeraceae and Pontosphaeraceae and extinct Family Zygodiscaceae. These show highly variable shape, but similar structure, and there is strong palaeontological evidence for their evolutionary connections (Romein 1979; Aubry 1989).
| Helicosphaeraceae | ||
| Pontosphaeraceae | ||
|
Zygodiscaceae (Palaeogene only) |
|
Coccolith structure: V-units form outer rim; in Pontosphaeraceae, this is a narrow cycle of anticlockwise-imbricating elements, in the Helicosphaeraceae, a helical flange. The R-units form a proximal plate of rather regular, inward-growing elements and a distal blanket, which typically appears as a mass of minute, tangentially-elongated crystallites. Growth does not occur downwards from the proto-coccolith ring and so the alternating belt of V-R nuclei remains clearly visible on the proximal surface.
Life-cycles and culture studies: Helicosphaera carteri and H. wallichii have been cultured repeatedly (Inouye pers. comm.; Probert & Houdan 2004) and Scyphosphaera apsteinii once (Probert & Houdan 2004). No life-cycle transitions have been observed in these cultures, but combination coccospheres have been observed for Helicosphaera (Cros et al. 2000; Geisen et al. 2002), Pontosphaera and Scyphosphaera (Frada et al. 2008). These indicate that the haploid phase forms holococcoliths with distinctive rhomboid-array ultrastructure (formerly included in the genus Syracolithus).
Neogene: Helicosphaera; Helicosphaeraceae; hyalina; Pontosphaera; Pontosphaeraceae; Scyphosphaera; Syracolithus; Zygodiscales; Holococcoliths
Paleogene: Pontosphaera; Pontosphaeraceae
Genus Helicosphaera Kamptner, 1954
Description: Coccoliths with helical flange, sub-groups can be recognised based on presence/absence of a disjunct bar, bar orientation, flange shape, etc. (see e.g. Theodoridis 1984, Perch-Nielsen 1985b, Aubry 1990, Young 1998).
Type: Helicosphaera carteri
Synonym: Helicopontosphaera
Subdivision: The large number of described species have been variously subdivided into sub-groups by different workers (e.g. Aubry 1990, Theodoridis 1984). The subdivision followed here is essentially based on Young (1998). The recta group appears to be a clearly separate lineage from the other Helicosphaera species, but the phylogenetic unity of the walbersdorfensis and ampliaperta groups is less certain.
| |
Helicosphaera carteri group - typical forms |
NP9-NN21 | Includes: H. carteri, H. euphratis, H. hyalina, H. intermedia, H. granulata, H. inversa, H. sellii, H. pavimentum, H. wallichii |
| |
Helicosphaera ampliaperta group - with open central area, sometime spanned by narrow bar |
NP21-NN4 | Includes: H. ampliaperta, H. mediterranea, H. scissura, H. truempyi |
| |
Helicosphaera recta group - with flange abruptly terminated and inversely-oriented pores/bar | NP23-NN11 | Includes: H. gertae, H. obliqua, H. orientalis, H. perch-nielseniae, H. recta |
| Helicosphaera walbersdorfensis group - small, with flange extending unusually far round coccolith, normally-oriented oblique pores |
NN2-NN11 | Includes: H. magnifica, H. stails, H. vedderi, H. walbersdorfensis, H.waltrans |
Drawings - the drawings used in the table above are from Theodoridis (1984)
Original description:
Neogene: Helicosphaera; hyalina